It wasn’t planned this way, but as the
articles came in for this month’s edition, a theme emerged: the uses,
handling and consequences of information.
Since Sept. 11, 2001, authorities have been
haunted by the failure to connect the dots of information that might
have prevented those terrorist attacks, and so the quest began to
synthesize and analyze all available information to prevent its
recurrence.
On the federal level, that led to the creation
of the National Counterterrorism Center and the National Director of
Intelligence. In the 2003 Homeland Security Presidential Directives
(HSPDs) 5, 7 and 8, the ground was laid for improved preparedness and
better coordination between federal and local agencies. States,
localities and, especially, regions absorbed the message. This gave
impetus to a movement to create “fusion centers” where information from
law enforcement, federal intelligence and other sources could be
synthesized and analyzed. In this edition, Philip Leggiere provides an
overview of the movement, and Kelley Vlahos chronicles its
implementation in the National Capital Region.
But just connecting the dots is not a
universal panacea. Consider the case of Boston as detailed by Jeff
O’Neill, our local correspondent. There, the dots really did seem to be
connecting toward a terrorist plot—but in fact they had a completely
different explanation. (And let it be said that Boston authorities
acted absolutely appropriately and with proper force given the events
as they unfolded.)
Or consider what happened to Maher Arar as
chronicled by WR Stephens, our Toronto correspondent. Inaccuracy and
information mishandling resulted in devastating effects on an innocent
individual who was deported to Syria, where he was tortured. As a
result of an exhaustive Canadian government inquiry, the details of the
case are now available for public scrutiny.
Just before press time, another case of the
power of information came to light in a local newspaper, the Naples
Daily News in Naples, Fla.
This is the case of Louis Dorcellian, a
Haitian immigrant to the United States who followed all the legal steps
for asylum, married another Haitian immigrant residing legally in the
United States, was working productively and began raising a family,
thinking he was secure in his legal status. However, following a minor
traffic stop for too many trinkets hanging from a rear-view mirror,
Dorcellian was arrested when his name showed up in an immigration
database—but without the notation that he had filed for an adjustment
of his legal status after an initial denial of asylum. To make matters
worse, it occurred hours before he was to board an airplane to become a
legal refugee in Canada.
Dorcellian was deported back to Haiti on Dec.
27, 2006, leaving behind a pregnant wife and five children—and facing a
situation in which he claimed he was subject to political persecution.
At HSToday’s press time, Dorcellian’s
wife and lawyers were asking the Department of Homeland Security to
waive a 10-year bar against his re-entry to the United States.
This was a case where the slowness of the
immigration system and the failure of a database to include all current
information on an individual’s status had a devastating impact on
someone who had tried to obey the law and follow the rules.
Power and responsibility
These cases demonstrate the tremendous power
that official information has over the lives of individuals. As this
information is increasingly aggregated and shared among more agencies
at different levels of government, the costs of errors, inaccuracies
and mishandling become ever greater. Anyone who has tried to correct a
computerized billing error or untangle the knot of an identity theft
knows the time-consuming frustration of working through a seemingly
impenetrable system. That experience can be multiplied tenfold when the
error is in official databases, and the consequences can be arrest,
deportation or worse.
There is a real terrorist threat to the
American homeland, and collecting and sharing information is a critical
defense against it. We don’t hold with those who believe that all
government data collection and sharing is somehow evil—it’s the only
way to protect the people of the civilized world against the barbarism
of terrorists.
However, these kinds of cases are important
reminders to those who handle this information of the awesome trust
that comes with it and the need to handle the resulting power justly,
responsibly, lawfully and very, very carefully. HST
|