65.8 F
Washington D.C.
Monday, May 29, 2023

Legislation Would Increase Number of FPS Officers, Improve Security at Federal Facilities

Two bills that would extend law enforcement retirement coverage to Federal Protective Service (FPS) officers and make other needed improvements to the security at federal facilities have been introduced by Rep. André Carson (Ind.).

FPS officers are sworn law enforcement officers who protect federal workers and visitors at 9,000 federal facilities nationwide, yet they do not receive the law enforcement retirement benefits provided to all other law enforcement agents within the Department of Homeland Security.

The FPS Improvement Act of 2015 (HR 1850) would make a number of reforms to FPS to security at federal buildings, including:

  • Increase the number of FPS employees to at least 1,870, including at least 1,318 in-service field staff, up from the current floor of 1,400 total employees;
  • Allow FPS to deploy more law enforcement officers in the field by excluding desk-bound managers from the definition of in-service field staff;
  • Clarify that FPS is the law enforcement agency responsible for protecting and policing all civilian, non-atomic federal facilities, not just those owned or controlled by the General Services Administration;
  • Mandate a training compliance tracking system for contracted security guards;
  • Require a report on the feasibility of converting all or part of the protective security officer workforce to federal employees;
  • Clarify the right of FPS officers to carry their firearms while off-duty; and
  • Require agencies to install security countermeasures recommended by FPS.

“Security in and around federal buildings has been given short-shrift for too long,” American Federation of Government Employees [AFGE] National President J. David Cox Sr. said. “This legislation is long overdue and would provide FPS with the resources it needs to carry out its mission.”

Carson’s Federal Protective Service Parity Act of 2015 (HR 1851) would apply certain annuity benefits to Federal Protective Service law enforcement officers, and for other purposes, and apply only to FPS officers hired after the legislation is enacted.

“Yesterday, Americans marked the 20th anniversary of the terrorist attack on the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, which claimed the lives of 168 people,” said David Wright, president of the AFGE Local 918, which represents more than 800 FPS officers. “Today, by introducing vital legislation to reform and expand the one federal agency charged with protecting federal buildings and their occupants, Rep. Carson has taken an important step in preventing a recurrence of this tragedy at another federal building in the US.”

“FPS officers carry guns, make arrests, perform investigations, and apprehend criminals,” Wright said. “They are law enforcement officers in every sense of the word, and they should be entitled to law enforcement retirement benefits.”

Wright added that FPS has suffered from recruitment, retention and morale problems because officers aren’t under the same retirement system as other federal law enforcement officers, including special agents within FPS.

He said, under law enforcement retirement rules, officers are subject to mandatory retirement at age 57 with at least 20 years of service, compared to age 60 with 20 years of service for other federal employees.

Homeland Security Todayhttp://www.hstoday.us
The Government Technology & Services Coalition's Homeland Security Today (HSToday) is the premier news and information resource for the homeland security community, dedicated to elevating the discussions and insights that can support a safe and secure nation. A non-profit magazine and media platform, HSToday provides readers with the whole story, placing facts and comments in context to inform debate and drive realistic solutions to some of the nation’s most vexing security challenges.

Related Articles

- Advertisement -

Latest Articles