47.9 F
Washington D.C.
Tuesday, October 4, 2022
spot_img

Lawmakers Question Obama Admin’s Unilateral Approval of Refugees Barred from Entry in Australia

Leaders of the House and Senate Committees on the Judiciary leaders have expressed frustration and concern with an Obama administration plan to admit into the United States an unknown number of refugees who Australia has refused to admit.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) stated the administration never disclosed to Congress that it was negotiating a deal with Australia, even though it was apparently in the works when administration officials provided a legally-required consultation to Congress on refugees in September.

Goodlatte and Grassley said they “expressed concern that the Obama administration’s secret negotiations with Australia left Americans in the dark about the full scope of its resettlement plans.” In a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, Goodlatte and Grassley said “the plan raises other questions, including how many refugees will be resettled in the United States and why Australia refused to resettle them.  According to administration officials, the refugees are largely from Iran, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia, Iraq and Sudan.”

The State Department has designated Iran and Sudan as state sponsors of terrorism.

Goodlatte and Grassley requested a “copy of the agreement and a classified briefing to gain a better understanding of the unilateral international refugee agreement that the administration negotiated without congressional consultation.”

On November 11, a press report surfaced disclosing that the United States government was finalizing a deal with Australia in which the United States would take refugees located on certain Pacific island nations that Australia has refused to admit. Congress learned, through the media, that 1,800 migrants interdicted before reaching Australia’s shores, could be transferred from detention facilities in Papua New Guinea and Nauru to US soil,” Goodlatte and Grassley said in their letter to Kerry and Johnson.

“Upon requesting confirmation of the news report, our staffs were briefed by officials from US Citizenship and Immigration Services and the State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration,” Goodlatte and Grassley wrote, noting, “Officials from your departments confirmed that an agreement between the US and Australia has been signed by a representative of the State Department, that the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) would refer individuals for resettlement to the United States, and that interviews and operations would begin almost immediately.”

Goodlatte and Grassley said, “Your employees reported that 2,465 individuals currently reside in detention facilities in Papa New Guinea and Nauru. When asked how many of the 2,465 individuals in the detention facilities the US agreed to consider for resettlement in the US, the briefers said that number was classified. However, your employees confirmed that the individuals being detained and who will be eligible to seek resettlement are largely from the following countries:

  • Iran
  • Stateless
  • Sri Lanka
  • Pakistan
  • Afghanistan
  • Somalia
  • Iraq
  • Sudan

 
“This situation is concerning for many reasons,” Goodlatte and Grassley wrote. “First, your departments negotiated an international agreement regarding refugees without consulting or notifying Congress. Such information was not disclosed to Congress during the annual refugee consultation that occurred on September 13, 2016, even though your staff confirmed that the agreement had, at the time, been negotiated ‘for months.’ Second, the agreement and the number of refugees to be resettled has been deemed by your departments as classified, thus the American people are left in the dark as to the rationale for this agreement. Third, the individuals who will be resettled are coming from countries of national security concern. In fact, two of the countries are officially designated by the State Department to be State Sponsors of Terrorism. Finally, it begs the question why Australia and other countries refuse to admit these individuals, what other countries are doing to help alleviate the situation, what kind of precedent this sets for future refugees interdicted at sea by Australian forces and prevented from entering Australia, and how a similar situation will be prevented in the future.”

Goodlatte and Grassley said, “We appreciate the offer to provide a classified briefing on the matter, but we also firmly believe the American people should be fully aware of the specific details of this agreement and why it was done in secret. We ask that you immediately make the agreement available to members of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and we ask for your cooperation to better understanding every aspect of this resettlement agreement.”
 

Homeland Security Todayhttp://www.hstoday.us
The Government Technology & Services Coalition's Homeland Security Today (HSToday) is the premier news and information resource for the homeland security community, dedicated to elevating the discussions and insights that can support a safe and secure nation. A non-profit magazine and media platform, HSToday provides readers with the whole story, placing facts and comments in context to inform debate and drive realistic solutions to some of the nation’s most vexing security challenges.

Related Articles

- Advertisement -

Latest Articles