spot_img
47.1 F
Washington D.C.
Wednesday, February 11, 2026

PERSPECTIVE: The Real Threat to Democracy Isn’t One Act of Violence. It’s Our Reaction

The assassination of Charlie Kirk is a jarring, deeply painful moment for the country—no matter where you fall on the political spectrum. Tragedy invites emotion. That’s human. But history warns us: the greater threat to our democracy often isn’t the act of one individual—it’s how the rest of us respond.

“If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.”

— Abraham Lincoln

Lincoln knew that America’s undoing wouldn’t come at the hands of a foreign army—it would come from within. From division. From fury masquerading as justice. From mobs who believe their cause is righteous enough to burn the rules down.

“There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.”

— Lincoln again

In the days of Lincoln, a mob meant fire in the streets. Today, it can mean fire online—viral outrage that moves faster than facts, punishes with no due process, and multiplies the worst instincts of the crowd. The digital mob doesn’t need torches. A trending hashtag can destroy reputations, fuel conspiracy theories, or incite real-world violence in a matter of hours. In many ways, it’s more dangerous than a mob in the square—because it feels bloodless, distant, and justified.

The Founders saw this coming in their own way.

“Liberty is to faction what air is to fire…”

— James Madison, Federalist No. 10

They knew that freedom would naturally give rise to conflict—and that’s not a flaw, it’s the design. But when factionalism is fed by unchecked emotion and echo chambers, it turns combustible. The purpose of our Constitution was to contain those flames—not fan them.

Even George Washington, in his Farewell Address, warned that the endless back-and-forth domination of opposing factions could rot a republic from the inside. He called it what it was: a “frightful despotism.”

This is not a moment for escalation, for vengeance, or for gleeful tribal score-settling. That’s not justice. That’s collapse.

If we’re serious about preserving this fragile, messy, extraordinary experiment in self-government, we have to resist the impulse to strike back. We have to choose principles over passions. Process over panic. Law over spectacle.

And as Utah Governor Spenser Cox so artfully put it, this isn’t just about one man, it’s about all of us.

Thomas E. Brzozowski was Counsel for Domestic Terrorism in the U.S. Department of Justice’s National Security Division, Counterterrorism Section. In this role, he served as the Department’s primary point of contact for domestic terrorism matters, coordinating across federal agencies, Congress, and international partners to shape legal and policy approaches to emerging threats. Brzozowski served as Advisory Board Member for DOJ’s State and Local Anti-Terrorism Training Program, Board Director for DHS's National Counterterrorism Innovation, Technology, and Education Center of Excellence, and was a peer reviewer for DOJ’s National Institute of Justice, providing expert guidance on law enforcement training, research strategy, and grant evaluation to strengthen domestic terrorism prevention, advance counterterrorism operations, and ensure research integrity and impact.

Brzozowski is also an Adjunct Professor at The George Washington University Law School, where he teaches a seminar on legal and policy issues concerning domestic terrorism. He also served as Assistant General Counsel at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of the General Counsel, where he served as counsel to the FBI’s Domestic Terrorism Operations Section (DTOS).

A U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s Corps officer, Brzozowski has held positions as a commander, military judge, appellate attorney, and prosecutor, and has advised the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on operational and international law. His active-duty service includes assignments as a platoon leader and battery executive officer with the 18th Field Artillery (Airborne) Brigade. He has authored widely on national security and counterterrorism law, including recent pieces in the Harvard National Security Journal and the DOJ Journal of Federal Law and Practice.

Brzozowski holds a Master of Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College, an LL.M. from Georgetown University Law Center, a J.D. from William & Mary School of Law, and a B.A. in International Relations from the College of William & Mary.

Related Articles

- Advertisement -

Latest Articles